List Wars Should Stop

[Normchacho]

sales2099 said:

For one thing we have no unified rules.

- Some list all games, despite many having sub 70 metas
- Some list only exclusives in a 1 vs 1 comparison, even when both have multiplats on one but not the other, which should count but are completely neglected. But that said, the list equalizes when certain games have more worth/relevance then others.
- Some do indies and some don't. That is ok but the problem is that some weigh them the same when we both know a 90+ meta indie and a 90+ AAA exclusive are not equal in the eyes of the core gamer.
- Some didn't include motion games.....this was due to kinect having some games with decent metas like Dance Central while the other didn't have any above the 70s meta

We need a unified system here or nothing at all. That is why I now keep my lists simple and without filler: just system sellers.

Hahaha and what counts as a system seller? Why is a system seller even more important than a regular game to the gamer? Even the biggest "system seller" only helps a console for a short period of time. Libraries sell consoles and because libraries sell console just talking about whatever you think counts as a "system seller" is all but missing the point.