Some people here apparentely have no idea of Legal system. Let me just say that for criminal charges you must be guilty beyond all reasonable doubt (and since they never done the exam to determine alcohol in the organism), but for civil actions you may sue on the assumption that the other party could have done a better job on avoiding the situation.
So yes, the family could sue her for reckless drive even if she wasn´t sollely at fault in the case (which is impossíble t determine how much at fault the lady was if the full investigation wasn't conducted). And she could sue the boys that survived, but suying the family of the dead makes no sense at all since they weren't even remotely involved in the accident.
Next she will sue the car maker to allow the car going 90 km/h on dark. And I still don't understand where the boys failing to brake contributed to the accident? The only thing braking would cause the boys to be met by the car faster and with more kinect energy against them (probably killing the other boy). Maybe she wanted to say she failed to brake.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
