Why is it hard to believe that third parties are biased against Nintendo?

[Danman27]

impertinence said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

impertinence said:

Captain_Tom said:

Why is it so hard to believe that third parties have a very valid reason for avoiding Nintendo?

This oft repeated sentence is in itself a great example of bias.

He's right though, they have a valid reason.

A valid reason if you buy into the bias, sure. Anything can be a valid reason. "I don't want to" is a valid reason for anything, it is also heavily dependent on bias.

The statement "Third parties have a good reason to avoid Nintendo" is a steaming pile of confirmation bias.

"But I don't want to, isn't a valid reason. Third parties have very little reason to develope for the wiiu. Nintendo has kind of alienated themselves from devs when they decided to say they didn't need them with the wii generation. Then there's also the fact the wiiu simply doesn't tend to have high sales with almost any game. It's simply not worth the risk to invest into it.