tbone51 said:
Well it'll be hard to word "Complete" for a game, but for DLC (especially Day 1) means it could of been apart of the game, instead being sold as extra profits. Ex: Lets say SSB had DLC day 1 with an extra 3 characters. That was already ready to be in the game but now instead of $60 for a game i have to spend $70 for a game if i want the full experience now??? Thats kinda a sneaky way to charge a game more money! |
exactly, there is no definition.
for $60 they "could have" included the day 1 DLC. ...and they "could have" included all DLC. ...and they "could have" included access to all content ever released in that franchise. ...and they "could have" included all works that developer ever makes from not until eternity.
so let's look at smash brothers. in smash bros brawl there were 35 characters. in smash bros wiiU there are already 29 characters officially announced and a rumored screenshot that shows 39 characters in the final roster. that 4 additional character for the last "complete game". i guess that means SSBwiiU is 111% of a game. so now you're going to tell me that is 3 more characters are availible day 1 you are going to be mad about it? ...you should like a bitch. a whiny, entitled, fucking bitch.
games were $50 in 1986. if games simply kept up with inflation you'd be paying $107 per game today.
so do me a favor. stop complaining and act like a real consumer. look at the product offered for the price and buy the products worth it to you. 'cause this blanket rule complaining is bullshit. games are a fucking steal of a way to entertain yourself these days.
