superchunk on 22 April 2014
The only time I feel its bad is the same with all DLC. When its clearly part of the original game and you are basically receiving a game that is less than previous iteration in the series.
MG is the perfect example of how to do it right. You first build the same game (content wise) that you've always provided. Then you work on purely extra content to provide at a reasonable price.
You're getting more, not less.
COD/BF are example of crap. They take out guns and other items that were normally part of the regular rank up system. But now you pay extra to get it. Kinda like micro-transactions.
