DerNebel said:
Because you said that this move wasn't inherently greedy, which I disagree with. I feel this move is very greedy, so much so that it forgoes the in my opinion better decision of pricing the stuff cheaper so more people buy it and it instead goes for the very simplistic but very often also wrong "ask for more money=make more money"-approach. |
I was using the moral connotation of greed.
However, if by greed you mean "desire for more" then, based on your logic, Sony's actions are not greedy. They aren't greedy because this price will result in less money for them - according to your prediction. The greedy decision would be to actually price it lower because that would result in more money.
So what interpretation of greed are you using?
