spurgeonryan said:
|
Because being hard headed and trying to make a valid point while blocking out any discussion under the guise of the scientific method pisses me off.
He is spitting in the face of everything that is called scientific debate. There is a difference between stating what you believe in and having an agenda. He knows very well that there is no empirical data for evolution because it is impossible. Exactly how impossible it would be to proof anything that is by definition unattainable for humans like witnessing the big bang or seeing god.
His points add absolutely nothing to the discussion of evolution. No scientist claims to have proof for evolution, much like no one claims that he can disprove it. Both would be foolish.
He just wants to hear someone say the magical T-word so he can rest his case which never was one.
All I can say is that there is a thing called "evidence" and there is tons for evolution varying in strength. That's why the vast majority of scientists and non-scientists believe it is the truth. Which makes the second sentence of the OP already a blatant lie.
Yes, I would very much shut up every liar who spews his filth in my direction.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
