By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dahuman on 17 April 2014
Edit Thread
Leadified said:
dahuman said:
Leadified said:
dahuman said:


The place where Dan came from is simple, if Joe wanted to toss IGN in there, then he should have left out the review scores 9-10 part because now people are linked in their mind to IGN which scored the game in the 8 category and not 9-10, and it's indeed a misrepresentation. Joe fucked up, Dan got too worked up, Joe came out with wtf insults, dumb asses, but Dan is not wrong.


Well I would understand if the part where he said 10/10 and 9/10 was at the same time as when he showed IGN's review score in the video but he didn't, IGN's score was after. Also Joe said "high scores", 10/10 and 9/10 were just examples. 8.9/10 is still a high score so his point still stands. Unless Dan wants to argue that 8.9 is not a high score.


You can't set something as an example without including them in the first place...... From the video, in Joe's opinion, he did not include 8.9 as his example of a high score, so that point can't really stand ground since 8.9 is your opinion of a high score..... Maybe it's Joe's as well, but he sure as hell didn't say anything about it in his review, just saying.

Uh yeah he did. He showed off IGN's score, in Joe's opinion that was a high score. Why would he show it off if he didn't think so? On a scale of 1 to 10, it's pretty clear that 8.9 is a high score, that's not even an argument.

I must have missed that part since my youtube was minimized due to being at work if that's the case lol, prolly could have avoided that drama if he didn't post the IGN scores in that case I guess, interwebz drama FTW!