dahuman said:
Leadified said:
dahuman said:
The place where Dan came from is simple, if Joe wanted to toss IGN in there, then he should have left out the review scores 9-10 part because now people are linked in their mind to IGN which scored the game in the 8 category and not 9-10, and it's indeed a misrepresentation. Joe fucked up, Dan got too worked up, Joe came out with wtf insults, dumb asses, but Dan is not wrong.
|
Well I would understand if the part where he said 10/10 and 9/10 was at the same time as when he showed IGN's review score in the video but he didn't, IGN's score was after. Also Joe said "high scores", 10/10 and 9/10 were just examples. 8.9/10 is still a high score so his point still stands. Unless Dan wants to argue that 8.9 is not a high score.
|
You can't set something as an example without including them in the first place...... From the video, in Joe's opinion, he did not include 8.9 as his example of a high score, so that point can't really stand ground since 8.9 is your opinion of a high score..... Maybe it's Joe's as well, but he sure as hell didn't say anything about it in his review, just saying.
|
Uh yeah he did. He showed off IGN's score, in Joe's opinion that was a high score. Why would he show it off if he didn't think so? On a scale of 1 to 10, it's pretty clear that 8.9 is a high score, that's not even an argument.
