Rychussnik said:
on topic, I think joe was right, when Titanfall released, i watched he and IGN's review, and both reviewers make valid points. Joe knocked the game over it's shoehorned campaign, and Ryan (IGN) really enjoyed the chaos of the multiplayer, two different people, two different scores. ~Mod Edit~ This post has been moderated. -Smeags |
Thats exactly the problem with today reviewers, most of them beeing impartial and aim all their apreciation towards just one part of the game for example MP only part, Joe in other hand sees games as what it has to have to be a complete package thats why I agree 100% on him. That reviewer in IGN should get a department change and stay away from reviews cause this guys cant differentiate between a complete game and a half game, MP only games shouldn't cost full price , I wouldn't have any problem with Titanfall if it cost at max 29.99, I mean you need to have by force internet to have fun with this game. and you know what is even worse ?, if a new guy/girl start playing this game right now, I'm 100% sure is gonna get owned by the most advance players. I mean really pay 60 bucks to get owned right away ?, that's why SP part is so important it dives you into the game mechanics first.
