The Fury said:
Based on your points, no I don't agree you are taking side, however you did say he was "more" right. Which is why you looked as though you were taking sides. This said, based on twitter conversation Joe 'wins' because talking about Watch_dogs does not mean you expect someone from another company randomly come in and rant at you about something else you did a month ago. If Dan had an issue it should have been in private to Joe directly, maybe asked professionally to remove the references to IGN or change them. This is where this industry lacks when it comes to reviewers. Professionalism because it is made up of those that grew up playing games and are still in essence kids themselves, this is evidence of it. Twitter allows them to do this. |
Lol ya, that is exactly what Dan should have done. But he didn't, and the way that Joe responded to Dan was not professional either. If he simply said something like,"I'm sorry I didn't realize I was misrepresenting ign, I'll try not to do that again" (I'm not saying he has to apologize, or say he made a mistake, this is just a quick example of what the "better man" would do). Then Joe would have "won" but instead he came out looking just as childish as Dan. So I wouldn't say that anybody "won" just somebody lost slightly "less" depending on your point of view.
Something...Something...Games...Something
