By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Digi30 said:
Brutalyst said:
TheSting said:
mochachino said:
The game is not worth a full price $60.


To who?


I do sort of agree with him, but not on the basis of lacking a proper single player (which in fairness he doesnt say that) but due to the lack of longevity the game provides. It was a good game and I really enjoyed it, for less than 24 hours (about 16 would be about right). Where as Battlefield 4 with all its problems even prevented me playing it, I clocked up almost 300 hours and still dont feel like I experienced everything, just got a bit bored of what I had. Yet with Titanfall, as much as I enjoyed it, which I did, I felt like I had done it all after 16 hours (max) of play.

For me it has been the opposite. BF bored me after about 40 hours and I just couldn't stomach it anymore.


Well thats always an opinion on any game, a game I might think is shit, you might think is great, and a game I play for day, you might play for months or years :) that just comes down to personal taste and doesnt make either one of us wrong :) thought usually a majority will follow trend, but thats a whole different thread where we ask people who played both who played which more :p



The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them.

Ernest Hemmingway