Mr Khan said:
It's a chicken-or-egg problem, though. Nintendo also funds third party titles which they feel are worth funding (three-game deal with Sega on Sonic, or their alleged Monster Hunter moneyhat), but how many third parties have even come to Nintendo with games that are worth funding? Hell, Ninty gave money for Ninja Gaiden 3 (not that i'm complaining, as i rather liked Razor's Edge), a game widely reviled. To get top-billing for the games that are "worth" it (like, say, Assassin's Creed), Nintendo would have to really ante up, beyond whatever Sony's offering, and Ubisoft would have to see the value in that. |
I think you just answered your own question. Look at the games you listed taht they funded. Sonic? come on he hasnt been that relevant since Genesis days. MH? thats good...in Japan. Ninja Gaiden?!!! please that game got a superior release on the PS360 ANYWAY so what did they accomplish there? Those are small fry, you said yourself they have to get top billing games and no its not the responsibility of the 3rd parties to approach them. THEY have to approach 3rd parties. And im not talking just Japanese ones, I love that culture and games but they are nowhere near as relevant as they used to be. And even then there big games are skipping WIi U. I dont see KH3, FF15 or MGS coming soon.