| badgenome said: Well, the DS version had rather high quality pixel art while the quality of the Vita version's 3D graphics is not so great, so I can kind of see where they're coming from there. But given that the Tales games completely dominated the voting, nobody should be surprised that this is where Shahid's efforts went. It wouldn't have been my first choice, either, but it was reasonably well reviewed. Better this than nothing, for sure. On the entitlement tip, I love the way entitled people react when they're informed that they do, in fact, feel entitled. Every now and then someone will state the obvious in a thread full of whiners, and the throes it sets off are nothing short of breathtaking. |
Hmm. Having just sat and watched a lengthy video of Hearts, I can understand where that argument is coming from, but I don't really agree with it.
Having said that, I massively prefer Tales since it switched to 3D combat. So having 3D graphics to go with it, even terrible ones, is par for the course.
My biggest problem with that thread so far is that there seems to be a hivemind of "they ruined Hearts with Hearts R", yet this echoed opinion is never expanded on. There's maybe one or two people in that thread who actually offer feedback on what the game does better/worse than the original game; everyone else just seems to be repeating this opinion rather than saying why.
And besides, I didn't play the original. I'm willing to bet the majority of people in the west didn't!
(And I'm really growing to love Tales. Should this turn out to be true, it may dislodge Dangan Ronpa 2 as my most anticipated game!)
