By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
4k1x3r said:
selnor1983 said:
Shaunaka said:
selnor1983 said:
Shaunaka said:
I haven't been here long, but I can't take anything Selnor says seriously at all. There have been massive contradictions and just plain poor thinking in much of what I've read from him.

Guess I can't make this statement without proving it.

Well, here he says that he only gives a score based on fun. But I also just read his Ryse review and the "best console graphics ever" certainly influenced his score there. It's just very sad that he lives in this little cloud up in la-la land and thinks people take him seriously. Oh well.

Some games are story driven. Visuals help these types of games tell stories. Why does praising visuals in a cinematc game mean that doesnt add to the fun of the game.

You stated that you rate and give scores based on "fun" alone.

Yet you rated and scored Ryse because of graphics.

The point certainly stands.

Again why can graphics not add to the fun of a game? Visuals are part of a game. And in a cinematic game visuals can help the fun. Your being pretty narrow minded

If you want an answer, because you're inconsistent in your arguments. I won't bother looking for them over the years, people know what we're talking about.

I rest my case. Every part that make up a gam can add to the fun factor of a game overall. The fact you chose to ignore that is your right to be ignorant.