Pemalite said:
|
Not actually... no.
More expensive... yes. Worse... no.
Because said studies, don't actually look at the results of heatlhcare and instead use things like life expectancy while not accounting for things like teen pregnancy, fatal inujuries, crime, poverty. They just basically take a few nationmaster like stats and run a regression. It's lazy lazy work.
Just to give an example of when you factor in just one of those factors... (By replacing everyones fatal injuries with an average rate.)
When you've got way more young people in the US getting murdered at 20, it's pretty obvious our life expectancy will be lower.
Yet that doesn't really reflect on our healthcare system. Not that 2 years here or there is exactly a huge statiscal point anyway.
Hell, you've got more indepth research that suggests that our government healthcare system is worse then not having insurance.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2011/03/02/why-medicaid-is-a-humanitarian-catastrophe/
The article is a bit senationalist, but it runs off some of the studies in it.
A switch to universal healthcare, very likely could drag us down to the actual middle of that list.