But for your specific example, let me ask:
Where does he receive his right to live in a house and receive health-care, without exchanging something of equal value? If all parties chose to refuse health-care or housing to him, they do not want to work for nothing (or even if he can pay), how might these parties deny it? If they cannot, are they not slaves? If the care or house is funded by somebody else, say the woman who wants to buy her third Mercedes Benz, can she refuse? Let's say, no, she cannot, then you used the product of her time and haven't compensated her, is she not a slave? Her existence is only to serve him, is it not? Then she is a slave. Is slavery a liberal position? Is liberty (the antithesis of slavery) not a natural right? Those are all questions that arise in my mind from your example.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
