sc94597 said:
Those aren't natural rights. They might possibly be contractual obligations, but it would have to be a real contract and not the inconsistent concept of the "social contract." This is of course if we are assuming a deontological ethics position. Most socialists assume consequentialist ethics, and don't need to justify their actions with the concepts of rights or obligations. Which makes them illiberal. |
Right: freedom, like all things, is only good insofar as it is useful.
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.