the-pi-guy said:
1.) Backwards compatibility is not something that most consoles have. Could you argue that Nintendo was greedy with every system up until the GCN using your same logic? 2.) Backwards compatibility is best done with the actual hardware. This is how previous systems did it. This is how the PS3 did it for the earlier versions. They might be working on a emulator right now for the PS4. But it might not be possible. 3.) A year old game that was praised, getting rereleased for PS4 with improvements is not worthy of praise? A lot of people wanted this to happen anyway. What difference does this make really? Can you no longer play the game on the PS3? Or is it a nice bonus for a game to be remade for newer hardware. Why can't I play Nintendo games on PlayStation consoles? Greed? |
You're talking about the GCN? That was back when the technology was relatively new and it wasn't standard. It would have been a major hassle for the GCN to play N64 games since they were two entirely different formats. Nowadays it's no problem to include something like backwards compatibility since games have been disc based for a long time, and it should be standard. X1/PS4 could easily have it if Sony/Microsoft weren't greedy. But the public supporting this type of thing ensures that it will never be standard again, believe that. Yes it's nice for OLD games to be updated to newer hardware. The Last of Us is a freaking 9 MONTH old game that is barely going to look any different on PS4. And what on earth are you bringing Nintendo not playing Playstation games into this for? That's a laughably stupid comparison.







