Obama: Ignoring Russian Aggression Would Have Global Consequences

[Kasz216]

Sharu said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

 

=

 

 

 

 

Nice words, but what can you do to make it real?
Say, if USA wants it to be true, they have 2 ways:
1. Take other's nuclear weapons by military power, crush all the science who can produce it and the civil objects using it (like Nuclear power plants, as potentially it can lead to weapons).
2. Be a moral leader of the world, get rid of nuclear weapons themselves and say - hey look at me and do it the way I do.

Which way would you prefer?

Neither is possible, once someone has nukes you can't take them away.

 

That said.  When it comes to limiting nukes, for example I'd prefer 1, but not just including the US but most nuclear states and most countries who support them.  Only in the cases where countries refuse to stop setting up nuclear weapons programs with other methods.  (Like the sanctions that currently exist etc(.

 

Why?  Because the world isn't an episode of Captain Planet.

No country is really going to follow suit.

 

Hell no country would even believe the US got rid of all their nukes.  Just like with Biological weapons.

 

and Nuclear plants where countries like Russia supply and recover all the Uranium works well enough to keep Nuclear Plants in buisness.