Obama: Ignoring Russian Aggression Would Have Global Consequences

[the2real4mafol]

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

the2real4mafol said:

Kasz216 said:

 

Your arugment is that because even big stable countries shouldn't have nucleaer weapons... everyone should have them.

No i don't think anyone should have them but since we have them, we can't tell other countries not to have them without disabling our own. Having nuclear weapons is something awful I think 

Why?  Becuase we have nuclear weapons we can't tell more unstable dangerous nations to not have them?

That doesn't make any sense.

but ok.  Let me rephrase that...

your argument is because even big stable countries shouldn't even have nulear weapons...  EVERYONE should can have them.

 

So, becaue there is a .01% chance the US or UK could get it's nuclear weapons stolen and won't get rid of theirs... these two nations should let other countries get nuclear weapons.  Even though it greatly increases the chance of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of people who will use them in highly populated areas far higher then the chance it happens in the US or UK.

Humans are too stupid to have something that can be potentially destructive, that applies to all countries not just 'rogue states'.