Obama: Ignoring Russian Aggression Would Have Global Consequences

[Kasz216]

mai said:

Speaking about trustworthy countries and so trustworthy, who should have nuclear weapons and who should not. Do I remember that correctly and the US just "sunk" four nuclear warheads into the ocean near Greenland? AFAIR one of them is STILL there :D BTW does that makes Denmark a possessor of a nuclear weapon?

 Just saying. Intesresting episode of the world history, if I'm not mistaken this is only incident in history when nuclear weapon was "lost".

Actually that's not even the first time the US has misplaced Nuclear weapons....

Hell, if they just recently sunk 4 there, it's not even the first time the US lost Nuclear warheads near greenland.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/a-nuclear-needle-in-a-haystack-the-cold-war-s-missing-atom-bombs-a-590513.html

That's not saying there aren't any similar situations Russian wise.

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_09/lebedsept

(Number has to be exagerrated though)

 

Really just makes a stronger point though on why you'd really want to limit nuclear bomb ownership.