| mai said: I sense that radiophobia runs strong in you, young padawan. Chernobyl et el is not an excuse for passing on oportunity to develop more eco-friendly tech for energy production, it's a reason to ramp up security measures. Would have TEPCO learned a lesson from Chernobyl, Fukushima might have done far less damage than it did. Yes, we won't rely solely on nuclear energy, but that's goes without saying, as if now we're relying solely on hydrocarbonates. Besides the biggest portion of renewables is hydro, and it's not exactly eco-friendly, plus hardly a universal solution.
|
It's not a good solution to energy shortages if there's any chance of making a place unhabitable. Defeats the point really.
As for renewable, most weather elements can be taken advantage of if the means to do so occurred. Wind, sun, waves, water. And it may not be good enough to be a universal solution yet but it should be good enough with time.
Not only that but we need to make ways of getting energy more efficient, it's just far too wasteful right now
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030
