By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fallen said:
Captain_Tom said:
manny10032 said:
This again. How long till we don't talk about this anymore?


When Xbox fanboys stop trying to defend it.  Once everyone accepts the difference, we will stop beating this dead horse (I hope it is soon).


Playstation fanboys will never stop trying to make a huge deal of every small difference (funny how last gen when PS3 has inferior multiplats it wasn't a big deal, and was usually blamed on "lazy developers").

 

Anyways Gilray seems like a major fanboy every comment I see from him in the past is something about how great PS4 is or attacking Microsoft's policies.

 

And funny how when Lanning said the gap was closing everybody was like "how would he know, Oddworld looks like crap graphically anyway and doesn't stress the consoles".

 

But now when a guy involved with Oddworld says PS4 is better, he does know?

Also, Gilray forgot to mention a few facts, XB1 has more CPU speed (1.75 ghz vs 1.6) more Geometry setup due to faster GPU clock (853 mhz vs 800 mhz), more game usable RAM (5GB vs 4.5GB), more peak bandwidth (176 GB/s vs 272 GB/s ESRAM+DDR3)

LOL both consoles will unlock more RAM for use so no one should be arguing that either way.  Also the CPU speed makes essentially no difference, and the bandwidth issue is just a laughable debate really.

I would like to point out that almost no one mentions the fact that the PS4 has an extra 256MB of DDR3 and a back-up ARM cpu to run background programs.  That way ALL of the performance can go towards running the games.  And yet people wonder why the Xbox One feels more sluggish in the UI...