By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MTZehvor said:

Assuming you're simply referring to there being too much ammunition lying around, I addressed this in my post, but allow me to elaborate. Since the ammunition in RE4 (unlike Dead Space 3) is based on each weapon, and is not generic ammuntion, which weapon you carry around is vitally important, since it can make what ammunition you find around worthless if you aren't carrying the right gun for it.

If that's not, then feel free to actually state your point instead of simply posting pictures implying I'm missing a point. That is, provided you have one.

And you've conveniently ignored my point about Dead Space 3's quality itself. It sounds more like you're simply trying to make EA seem better by making everyone else seem worse. Doesn't speak well to all of these supposed great games EA's produced.

The 37 weapons at once was sarcasm, simply meaning, you could hold a lot.  The airplane and your avatar is me stating, it went over your head.

You're acting like you couldn't hold one of each weapon in Resident Evil 4.  Playing on normal mode you won't ever come close to running out of ammo and you might have quite a few herbs and grenades stocked in your inventory throughout the game with as many weapons as you're planning on using.  Coincidentally, harder modes on Dead Space 3 reduce amount of ammo you pick up and there's a survival option which ammunition and health can only be created at the bench.

You stated that I'm attacking another series when I'm not.  I'm comparing, only because  I'm pointing out how hypocritical people are praising one while bashing another for doing the exact same thing.  Also yes, you use a single ammunition type in Dead Space 3, and the reason for that is literally how many different weapons  you can actually combine.  Having different ammunition for each would be a bit much, so they decided to go with a single ammunition type.  

About not explaining how Dead Space 3 is good, I shouldn't have to.  Do you always explain why a game is good every time one is brought up?  Infact I'm pretty sure along with several games that receive constant bashing from people who haven't played the games, games like  White Knight Chronicles, DmC Devil May Cry, Lords of Shadow 2, etc, I've probably explained more than once why I thought Dead Space 3 was a good game.  None of the poor reviews ever say it's gameplay is specifically bad, just that it's a shooter and let's whine and bitch about it, blah blah blah, here's a 7/10.  As I was comparing above, so is Resident Evil 4, except where Resident Evil went from almost no shooting to Rambo, Dead Space started out as a shooter in the very first one and it just became more of a shooter in Dead Space 3.  I mean do you really want to see a third game in a row where Isaac is shooting aliens in the dark?  I didn't.  If it was that all over again I would have just played Dead Space 2 again because it'd have been a third time in a row where they're in the same environment yet again.