HylianSwordsman said:
fatslob-:O said:
HylianSwordsman said:
This is a circular argument! You're trying to prove that Mega Man is a dead franchise by saying that Capcom wouldn't have stopped making games unless it was a dead franchise, and that therefore all the evidence against it must be in error because it's a dead franchise. That's completely illogical!
|
I'm not saying that evidence is error. You know full well that vgchartz is about ESTIMATION. As dumb as capcom may be they still have some business sense in them left ... The same case applies to the original bayonetta as well. Why does vgchartz have it sold at around 2 million ? If it sold 2 million coppies at $60 price tag most of the time then why did sega give the rights to Nintendo ?
YOU on the other hand simply can't say that Mega Man is alive and all well unless capcoms issues a statement about it's worth.
|
It's not all about estimation. It's about estimation for the first few years, but even after the first few months it starts to become affected by actual reported sales, like NPD. And I never said Mega Man was alive and well, just that it's worth something. Whether Capcom sees its worth or not is irrelevant to this discussion. Now stop trying to take the discussion off course. And stop using your circular argument to speculate things you have no way of knowing if they're true. I'm bringing actual evidence, you're just speculating.
|
And you have no idea if mega man star force 3 was successful ... The one who's using a circular argument is you because saying it sold decently doesn't equate it to being a success.
