ChronotriggerJM said:
Man I miss the days when a shitty game wasn't a game with an average score of 84 on metacritic xD. Resistance 1 had a few things fighting against it. 1.) Time, it HAD to be a launch title and time was definitely not a luxury. 2.) New hardware, everyone agrees that learning PS3 hardware is an absolute bitch. 3.) No middle ware, they built a new engine from the ground up to make resistance 1. 4.) First time making a serious/FPS game since Disruptor (PS1 game xD) And even after all of that, they came out and made a game that averages out to 84/100 on Metacritic :P Impressive I do say :) If you've seen the updates to their resistance engine from RFOM1 to R&C Futures, it's simply jaw dropping in terms of tech specs. (To me) the R&C futures engine blew away everything Gears of war brought to the table, I think it had higher res textures, much richer audio, vastly deep color pallet, a locked 60 frames per second, pathetically short load times, and plenty of streaming goodness, and from a few articles, for RFOM2, they have even more of the engine optimized for the PS3. So not only do they have vastly superior tools to work with, they're working on their own time. In terms of length and content I think we can all safely assume that Resistance 2 is going to obliterate Gears 2, and in my personal opinion, I think they will probably be able to outclass them on every corner of the table, graphics, audio, storytelling.. etc etc. But I'm a fanboy so take that with a grain of salt :P
@El Dude, true! The ambient noise was pretty good :) But the gun you end up using for 90% of the game sounded so lame (it almost sounded like a plastic jack-hammer, if that's possible xD), and the random dialogue that Fenix spews when doing anything from picking up ammo to taking cover is so annoying -_-; I say it's audio was terrible because I almost really do enjoy that game more on mute. And about the multi-player, if MGS4 ships with MGO, thats kinda moot :x |
Sorry I was thinking of Killzone 1, not resistance.
