Kasz216 on 02 April 2014
| DamnTastic said: lol wut. I'm impressed that law was still standing in 2013. |
There was no law.
What people are misreading.... and I don't really blame them since it's buried way down in the middle between a bunch of pictures is
The high school in question did not hold a prom until this year.
Parents would instead hold their own proms. Which apparenty were segretated. Which is terrible, but not really the same kind/level of terrible.
from 2013 mentions it.
Where they actually had a student sponsored interacial prom last year. So really, the more correct headline would be "School holds it's first prom".
