EB1994 on 31 March 2014
| endimion said: what flamingweazle is saying is exactly why I don't want GfG to become like PS+.... the very fact that PS+ gives away (rent who cares) more recent AAA games is a bad thing for me.... why??? you gonna ask!!! this is retarded!!! well because when I look at both offering so far yeah I agree PS+ has better quality more recent games no question asked.... they also have way less games I don't already own compare to GfG.... so if it were to become like PS+ I would end up getting less game in the end since I already have them.... what I love with GfG is that I get games I would have never bought or sometime never really paid attention to and realize I missed out or I just get a good filler until the next day 1 AAA title I will buy bottom line if GfG gives me halo 5 six month later or GOW 4 chances are it will be lost on me since those are day 1.... nos if in a year they give me zoo tycoon or lococyle those are 2 games I might not have yet even 2 years later.... so yeah PS+ is better (regardless of renting/owning debate) ... no it doesn't add more value to me since I would end up with less game to get since I more than likely own most of them already.... |
You do realize Ps Plus doesn't JUST offer triple AAA games right? There's always an indie title or two thrown in there. It's usually one big AAA game with a bunch of smaller/cheaper games. Like this month, Arkham City and Sly cooper Thieves in Time on PS3.
But alas, you haven't even experienced PS Plus before so how would you know?
