Flow said:
The first one? Took from south park, which is the truth but molded to be funny The second one? Wikipedia, yes i know that wikipedia can be edited by anyone but i don't agree to this argument since you can't tell which site to trust in the internets aniway. And Soriku don't have to do a deep research in scientology just because he was curious to know what it was. And aniway, i didn't lied to him, just presented the facts as some kind of parody just like you did with christianity and i think i made clear it was mostly a joke. So, no shame to soriku :] |
I'm not saying he needs to do deep research, just atleast know the facts.
What would be the purpose of him asking if he didn't want to know the truth and just settled with badly spun half-truths(Yes I consider the Christianity one the same way)?
If someone asked about Christianity and I gave him that crappy explanation about Christianity and the inquirer just took it in unquestioningly, do you think it's alright?
So yes, shame on Soriku. >:[

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iclim4 - "The Friends Thread changed my life!" (Pervert Alert!) Tags? 







