Should ubisoft cancel/delay the watch dogs pc version?

[Pemalite]

Nem said:

I have a feeling the PC version wont look like that first demo either. They probably will force parity with the PS4 for the most part.

Besides, the number of people with PC's that would be able to run it is negligable.

They probably will, that was status quo with last generation.
Darn consoles *shakes fists* always holding back progress!

Last time I checked there were roughly 5+ million Steam users with PC's that were faster than the PS4.
Obviously since then Steam added more users and percentages increased, but the Video card descriptions aren't working properly for me to verify the current numbers at the moment.
Something that should be kept in mind with Steams statistics is that: 1) It doesn't show multiple GPU's. 2) It doesn't show nVidia or AMD's GPU's if they're running Optimus/Enduro, Steam in that situation will simply count the Intel GPU.
So potentially there was more than 5+ million during that last count.
Could even be more better-than-the-PS4 gamers on PC than PS4's currently sold, although if indeed that is the case it won't last long with the PS4's current selling rate.

oniyide said:

MTZehvor said:
I'm gonna go ahead and admit it now: My PC's graphics don't look that much better than last gen's. :(

I also have absolutely no idea what the OP is talking about but I felt that was worth confessing anyway.

You're not the only one. People here make me laugh, the reality of the situation is that most people current PC arent going to push graphics much better than their home consoles, especially PS4 and Xbox1. Fact is their are very few people out their that is going to go the extra mile and get graphic cards more ram to even get it to current gen levels. They would rather pay the 400-500 dollars and not deal with the hassle.

Tons of people held off upgrading because to put bluntly... The Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 ports just didn't demand much in the way of hardware requirements, the Steam statistics showed a rather large upswing in hardware over the last several months.
Essentially if you had a 6 year old Core 2 Quad with 8Gb of Ram, then all you needed was a $30 Radeon 6570 and you can play most games at high settings (Without AA and AF) at 720P and get 30fps, with better graphics than the HD twins.

Converesly, allot of other people are rather happy just to sit with old hardware and play games with reduced image quality settings, heck, Call of Duty, World of WarCraft, League of Legends aren't graphical powerhouses yet are some of the most popular franchises on the planet, which cements the point that not everyone is infactuated about graphics.

Right now however, I have a PC that is theoretically more than 10x the performance of a Playstation 4 and that's all that matters to me. :)