Eddie_Raja said:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_z87_xpower_review,15.html http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performance/page6.html
The FX-83xx performs somewhere around an i5 - i7 pretty consistantly, the FX-63xx performs inbetween an i3 and i5, and FX-43xx is as strong as an i3. Are you one of the people that said the Pentiums were stronger than Phenom II X4's? You guys made me laugh so hard when all games started using 4 cores in 2012 and caused these intel budget builders to get sub 20 framerates. P.S. I have an i7-4770K and it kicks ass. My brother has an FX-8350, and it matches my old i5-3570K. |
Yea but the issue, and I continue to say this which you don't seem to understand, is that majority of the applications and games will still run better with the i5 which is even proven on your benchmarks. He spent almost 2k on his PC, he should have went with an i5 so that it can run better on most games instead of the ones that are just multi-threaded... If he was going a sub $1000 or $1200 build, sure, go amd, but above $1200 should be intel or at least the FX-8350 at minimum. And I respect Amd and my first gaming PC had an Amd Phenom II inside of it and I still use it to this day
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/699?vs=702
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







