By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarkD said:
 Why the hell not let gays be gays, and let people use birth control, and so on and so forth. Its a harmless way of lowering the human population, completely guilt free.

You can't stop people who are gay from being gay, just like you can't stop someone who is straight, from being straight... Or  a poodle from being a dog.
That's the cusp of the issue at hand here.

If you go back over the centuries, we had women fighing for womens rights, then those of non-caucasion descent fighting for their rights too, just happens that America and a majority of the free world *still* don't allow for equal rights for everyone, despite hammoring about all their freedoms to other nations.

Kasz216 said:

 

Sikhism, Hinduism, and Buddism all have their own anti-gay messages...  The common arguement is that despite a majority of Hindu and Buddist people against gay marriage they don't speak for all groups, though the same goes for Christians, as not all Christian Churches consider homosexuality a sin.

I've often heard people use the bible as an argument and more often than not use the line from Leviticus about a man laying with a man as it lays with a woman.
However, they take it out of context, back in those times men "owned" woman (Either husband, father etc'), like property, Leviticus was all about property ownership.
Basically you don't treat other men as your inferior or as property, nothing to actually do with homosexuality.
The  bible also hammers on about wearing clothes of different fabrics, divorce was condemned, you are not allowed to touch a woman for 7 days after her "monthlies". etc'.

In general it's used for arguments sake, so unless they want to kill all unmarried, non-virgin woman, those who are divorced and those who wear different fabrics, then they are talking out their posteriors and are being selective with the direction they point their hate and discrimination towards.

Besides, the bible was written in another time for a completely different society and then translated (Not accurately) for the western world, then people take quotes out of the book and use them literally, outside of it's intended context.

On the flip side, majority of "religions" don't actually have a meaning for "Gay/Homosexuality" or even an understanding of it (As Religion predates modern science), it was a term created relatively not long ago once the understanding of the "condition" increased and some of the stigma was proven false.

I personally beleive... That we all bleed the same colour of blood and we should *all* be treated the same, besides whose business is it anyway what goes on in the bedroom?



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--