By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r on 25 March 2014
Edit Thread
Wright said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
Wright said:

 

Capcom's own words, those of that Dead Rising 3 wouldn't have been made if it wasn't for MS.

I see I read something wrong, apologies. Though you didn't explain the fact that your first post does lead to interpretations due to poor wording of yours, so I guess you agree with me there!


I explained it and pointed out how you made the same mistake twice, but it seems the third time you completely ignored what I wrote.

and I need a link for "capcoms own words"

according to link below, its possible, but not by capcom alone, but they didnt go to the extent of saying that it had to be MS or they wouldnt have been made.

http://www.videogamer.com/xboxone/dead_rising_3/news/capcom_says_dead_rising_3_couldnt_have_been_achieved_without_microsoft.html


You are the one that says that the default strategy of MS is purchasing exclusives, which I prove not with the list of non-purchased exclusives (I guess, for the most part, the list is right inb4 someone points that one of that list was paid). Compare them to the ones they did purchase (and ended up on other's consoles anyway, lulz), to realize it. Just because the big names were paid doesn't mean that, for default, that's the rule of gold.

Which takes me back again that you purposedly wrote it to be left at the wrong interpretation. Which your explanation confirmed later in the second post, so you're basically saying I was right in being wrong because you did what you did. :P

 

And sure you need a link of Capcom's words. You wouldn't trust most sites in a delicated manner like this, wouldn't you?


Using your own logic, your failure to provide a source must mean you agree with me. (this logic also includes ignoring half of your post)