BloodyRain said:
Well that was rather insightful. Didn't really expect it from you lol. Still I find them usefull to have around to see the general consensus from a multitude of opinions before spending the cash on the product. Especially ones that I'm unsure about. |
well thank..... huh.. wait what?!
but yes, reviews, and usually metacritic, tend to provide the general consensus of the game. but how are these scores determined? how does a reviewer decide if a game is an 88 or an 89? on what basis? they all hide behind "its just my personal opinion". but then how is a score of a 9 from mark valued as the same as a 9 from steve or john? if everybody scores differently and see's games differently, then how do we use the same metric on all their scores?








