GamechaserBE said:
EB1994 said:
Torillian said:
EB1994 said:
Reviewers comparing inFAMOUS to GTA V now. 2 year project with 100 people Vs. 5 year project with 300+ people.
WTF? |
Do you really think that development time and the workforce of the developer should be something that comes into play for reviews? If GTAV is the apex of open world gaming then that's what inFamous should be compared to assuming that's the type of game it's trying to be. Unfortunately I don't think the inFaous games are ever going to have the kind of variety that GTA does because that's not their main focus, but if doing the same missions again and again gets boring then that should be taken into account.
|
Clearly, it wasn't taken into account for GTA V. Because you know, games journalism.
|
Games journalist are not the problem... fanboys who are emotionally invested in a company and can't stand when a exclusive get critized are the problem.
|
That's great, maybe you should redirect your reply to other people, cause this is clearly not the case for me. I was hoping that games like Killzone actually got a lower metacritic because it was utter shit.
If you think I'm "invested" in a company then you are mistake, as I could care less about the company itself. I just feel reviewers are unfairly reviewing inFAMOUS by comparing it to the likes of GTA. I'm not surprised, they gave inFAMOUS 2 a lower score when it was a much better game than inFAMOUS 1.
