HylianSwordsman said:
Too_Talls said:
hmm whats the criteria. don't see why successful companies would be on this entailed worst. |
Success has nothing to do with it. About 95% of all business endeavors fail completely from the beginning, so if financial failure were the criteria, we wouldn't even recognize the companies competing. Also, even if it were limited to established companies, why would it be a vote if the criterion was purely mathematical? The criteria for this contest are corrupt business practices, poor quality service or products, or any damage done to consumers by the company. So Bank of America and other banks always do well thanks to being seen as largely responsible for the current recession we're in, while EA has won the whole contest twice in a row now for many reasons. It's a contest of consumer perception, not financial success.
|
So basically, this tournement has a poor name choice. "worst" doesn't quiet imply what you explained. unless it's an open to your own intepretation voting system.
The fact that they would remain sucessful is because people still give them money, they all have alternitives so if you remain a customer you must believe that what you're paying for is the "best" option.
So I assume the winner would be the listed company with the least customers, unless the bigger comanies rack up votes for name sake alone by people who were never really customers to judge .......
Well a flawed system in opinions from a random group of partisipants can't be avoided I guess any way you look at it......Guess this whole thing was more of a waste of time even thinking about it.
