Chris Hu said:
fatslob-:O said:
Chris Hu said:
fatslob-:O said:
It's far too early to call this a "duopoly". Would you have considered 6th gen a "duopoly" when in fact the original xbox performed just as bad as the gamecube ? |
Actually the original X-Box did a lot better then the Gamecube since it actually moved software it still has the highest atachment ratio of any console. The main purpose of a console is to move software and so far still no other system has done it better then the original X-Box.
|
Having the highest attachment ratio doesn't mean much when the numbers are pretty comparable to those of the last 7 or so platforms before it. Just because the original xbox has 11 games attached to a console doesn't mean that it blew gamecube out of the water with 10 games per console. If the main purpose of a console is to move software then the original xbox did a pretty bad job considering that the software sales are a total of LESS than 300 million. There is NO damage controlling the fact that the original xbox did just as poorly as the gamecube.
|
Sure keep telling yourself that I guess you never heard of Halo 1 or 2 nothing on the Gamecube came even close to being as big.
|
Hardware
Xbox-24.65 vs Gamecube-21.74
Software
Xbox-271.46 vs Gamecube-208.61
Tie-Ratio
Xbox-11.01 vs Gamecube-9.60
Best selling software (over 5 million)
Halo-6.43, Halo 2-8.49 vs Smash Bros-7.07, Mario Kart-6.95, Mario Sunshine-6.31
Xbox did better than Gamecube but by a small margin so ur wrong by saying it did alot better.
