| halil23 said: This is what I think. Xbox : Nearly max out. Will maxed out in less than a year! Wii : Won't be maxed out till 2 years time. PS3 : Just keeps improving as time passes till 5 years time. |
Wow, I don't think you intended this... But it looks like you just praised Microsoft for making a GOOD console!
If they can max it out 3 years after it's been produced then I have to clap my hands together for Microsoft and really SHAKE their hands. They are WAY out ahead of the others still leaving processing power on the table! WHAT A WASTE!
Where does all this @#$% come from? In 5 years time a $25 cpu and $25 GPU will have twice the power of the PS3. If they leave that power on the table for all that time, it's because they did a BAD job. Not something to praise them for. Hell, making the Cell with 2 PPC engines and 4 SPE's (One disabled - maybe) would have been better. It would have been a more balanced and easy to program system, still able to be scaled for the Cell 2 having 2-3 PPC cores and 20+ SPE's. It was an arrogant decision seemingly borne from arrogance that the PS3 would completely dominate this generation. Furthermore all consoles have untapped potential, because there are always compromises to be made. I.E, having 1gb of system ram would be a great way to PULL OUT that untapped potential.
Edit: Think, what if they had just put in a tri PPC core like Microsoft did and stuck a g80+1gb of ram instead of 512. You'd be playing your games at 1080p and laughing your heads off at the Xbox crowd and their dinky little GPU.
Tease.
