Has the 360 past its limit?

[kenzomatic]

krik said:

kenzomatic said:

krik said:

arsenalrc15 said:
Do people not understand that the PS3 is not as powerful as the 360 in terms of graphics, shader structure, memory allocation and architecture, and utilization of processing power?

for info on PS3 vs Xbox 360 go to these links

http://www.hardcoreware.net/playstation-3-vs-xbox-360-one-year-later/

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6125087/index.html?type=tech

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html


The PS3's max will probably be KillZone 2 or MGS 4.

The Wii's max -- who the hell knows?

The 360's max -- GoW 2 will hold that title

 You're funny ;) So 360 is more powerful than the PS3? lol

 Also I disagree that MGS4 or KZ2 will push the PS3, they both first generation engines they will stand no chance to Resistance 2's. Maybe the next metal gear or killzone 3 will beat R2 but I bet the first games on those engines will not beat R2.

 Currently the best showoff of what the PS3 can do can be seen on R&C:TD (raw computing power, 60 FPS, lots of shit of the screen, amazing high res textures) and Uncharted (best graphics, water and lighting on any console).

 Like it or not, the truth is that PS3 > 360 and time will prove it. Hopefully we don't need to wait much longer and Resistance 2 will show us what PS3 can do. 

 

No he said graphics, Did you read the links

Here is another

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/xbox-three-sixty3.htm

 Oh really? How about you learn2read?

 "PS3 is not as powerful as the 360 in terms of graphics, shader structure, memory allocation and architecture, and utilization of processing power"

 EDIT:

I do not need to read the links... I know all these articles (they all biased one way or the other) but I also know the architectures of both. And like I said, time will prove me right.

You are being ignorant.

The ps3 can do more poly but the 360 will do better with the textures.