By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:

http://translate.google.fr/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamekyo.com%2Freview10714_metal-gear-solid-v-ground-zeroes.html

More Less
Paw + AMS 
+ Technically the hair 
+ The new possibilities 
+ Many approaches 
+ Getting perfect scene 
+ For those who want the rank S. .. 
+ At least we can not wait to see the rest of the scenario ...
- Life of shame 
- Bonus fig leaf 
- Two scenes, including an unprecedented ... 
- ... And that 3/4 of the elements have been seen in trailers 
- David Hayter we lack 
- The price, of course



Conclusion: Generally, it is said that the price should not play on the assessment of a product.But there are limits. And these limits have clearly been taken here with just what looks like a too questionable practice to be acceptable. Experience suggests good things for the rest of the program but how not to think that without content "bonus" not necessarily the most useful, the prologue would be nothing other than a little thicker than the demo average offering 2h 30mn gameplay by our desire to snoop such MGS2 demo at the time already offered hunting Dogs Tags wait for the fan. 

Then lies the feeling that Kojima has simply removed the introduction of his game, yet supplied with the other episodes, for sale at a public sometimes about everything, using false pretenses to justify action. And even being a fan willing to spend hours in the search rankings S, objectively, it really hurts. 

4/10

____________________________

Basically: Great game, but way way way too short for the price.


First review to kill a game based on price??? Never heard of that. This seems more like a gamefly rental for me.