theshonen8899 on 16 March 2014
I'm going to argue the exact opposite. More games should be multiplayer only. I paid $50 for Battlefield 2 back in the day and that game was rich and full of content. The fact that EA has seen fit to add a garbage single-player campaign to BF3 and BF4 instead of using those resources to add maps or more importantly POLISH THE GAME makes me furious.
I've paid for BF2, MAG, and many other multiplayer only games and I enjoyed them til the very end. It crushes me to see some of these go but I'd rather have a fleeting but better multiplayer experience than have a horrible, tacked on single-player addition.
