ICStats said:
J_Allard said:
Some people will value SP more than other people. Just like some people will value MP more than SP.
Infamous 3 comes out in just over a week. Should Sucker Punch only charge $40 for it because it has no MP? Is anyone buying Infamous 3 a "sucker"? No and no.
Another example and one that we can already play, Bioshock Infinite. It sold for $60 at launch and was very short. Yet I knew going into the purchase, what I was getting and had no problem paying $60. Should it only have cost $30 at launch because of no MP and short play length? No.
I know I am going to get hundreds of hours out of Titanfall. That type of play time would typically require tons of games at $60 a pop. For me $60 is a steal.
|
There are other games that have a campaign and are playable for hundreds of hours.
Titanfall is great value for someone who will play MP for hundreds of hours, but it would be better value for other people if it had a campaign too. It's just limiting it's appeal to some people especialy if they prefer SP over MP. |
Of course its limiting its appeal to someone when doesn't like MP as much as SP or prefers to have both in a game. But then again there are many games without MP and so they must be limiting their appeal too, but no one bats an eye at a $60 price tag for them.
