By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drkohler said:
kirby007 said:
bonzobanana said:

I have no idea why anyone takes these breakdown of costs seriously.

On a PC $471 probably represents teh manufacturing cost of a PC that probably retails at something like $700 and is only made in 10s of thousands of units.

quoted for being freaking right!

I'm pretty sure these breakdowns are made calculating backwards, meaning they start with the $499/$399 sales price, assuming the total manufacturing costs a few $ less than those values, and then go on internet sites to see what parts they could get that make up the price. It's been a (long) while since I had actual insights into manufacturing costs but some parts of this quoted breakdown are simply hilarious. Like the $60 MS is supposed to pay for 16 dram chips - they went for under $2 at the time ms reserved millions of them (which probably was around 2009). Or the $9 or $14 manufacturing costs (they likely mean this is what the plant manufacturer gets for each finished unit). Last time ms lowered the manufacturing price down to $14 (instead of somewhat over $20 another plant offered) - the result ended in the infamous rrod fiasco. Then there is the $37 they think a hd would cost. Or the mainboard cost which doesn't really appear in the teardown... I could go on but the point is: These simple breakdowns are most likely calculated "backwards".

doesn't change the fact those are estimates that anyone could have put together



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.