Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Spoken like a true ignorant. No offense, but the roster is what brings in the audience not just the name alone. Smash Bros doesn't sell other games Nintendo games, nobody wants to play starfox because they've played the space animals, nobody wants to play earthbound just because they've played Lucas. It might introduce someone to the character and thus the series. But its more important to have memorable characters in the roster than characters from Nintendo's games. That's the main reason All-Stars can't really compete with it, Sony doesn't have memorable characters that cross generations like Nintendo does. Look at the problem the Wii U is having right now, do you think Nintendo is in any position to be making demands? That's what they did back in the nes, snes, 64 and GC days and now look at em. |
How is it ignorant? Why should Nintendo promote a character that is nowhere to be found on their consoles? Developers that don't give two shits about Nintendo shouldn't have their characters in Smash Bros. Nintendo put Snake in Brawl and Kojima gave them a port of an 11 year old game on 3DS. No where near a fair trade.