inFAMOUS Second Son’s Retail Version Differences Compared To E3 2013 Trailer

[Ssenkahdavic]

Nate4Drake said:

Ssenkahdavic said:
Some of the character detail looks better, but overall its terrible.

Everything in the background is blurry and the lighting is pretty terrible.

Have you ever heard about  Depth of Field ??    Oh Jesus...  

 

https://www.google.it/search?q=depth+of+field&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=MSoiU87aOYby4QS9qIEg&ved=0CEcQsAQ&biw=1920&bih=899#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=KHvtk0_Oz9RE8M%253A%3BEzKJwLL0Qs9ryM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.the-walls.net%252Fwp-content%252Fuploads%252F2013%252F03%252FBlondes-Women-Scarlett-Johansson-Actress-Lipstick-Depth-Of-Field.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.picstopin.com%252F1377%252Fblondes-women-scarlett-johansson-window-panes-sheer-clothing-hd-%252Fhttp%253A%25257C%25257Chdwallpapersfor*com%25257Cwallpaper%25257Cblondes_women_scarlett_johansson_window_panes_sheer_clothing_desktop_1377x2040_hd-wallpaper-1677818*jpg%252F%3B2560%3B1600

That link is completely useless btw and has absolutely no bearring on this topic, nor my issues with it.

Depth of Field would be a perfectly valid argument if it was just 1 picture that I was looking at, not a comparison of mutiple pictures.  Do all character models look better now vs then? I said some so thats a no.  If that was a yes, then PERHAPS you could use the Depth of Field argument. 

While it definitely seems that there are a good few here that think it looks better now,  i do not.