By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fps_d0minat0r said:
vivster said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
vivster said:
I think nobody who wanted to play this game cared about singeplayer. Campaings like in COD and BF were just nice distractions, many people not even touching it and going straight to multiplayer. No one would need a campaign for LOL either.

I think online only multiplayer games are a good thing. But it would be even better if you could play them offline on LAN parties.


Yeah thats because it doesnt have one.

You underestimate the demand for sci-fi singleplayer games. Titanfall could have been epic with SP, much better than COD and BF, and driven the sales a lot more. Plus the guys in the submarine without internet connections could have played it too, but fuck em, right?

Yep that is one reason.

Why would it be bad for a game to not have a mode that it is not made for? Why are you looking for a game you want in a game that isn't what you want?


im not saying the MP is bad. im saying the SP could have been epic, and im sure it will be in titanfall 2 which hopefully wont be rushed like the first one clearly is.

A lot of things could've been great. A PS4 release for example. But I also think it is a good thing that the devs are making the game they want and are not forced to do a single player campaign against their will.

There are other people claiming SP is bad for multiplayer games because it takes away recources from perfecting the multiplayer. Which is a fair argument since making a singleplayer campaign just takes so much longer than making multiplayer. Of course Titanfall is a good example of how to still fuck it up when you're only doing multiplayer.(not saying it is bad but unfinished)

I hope if they do SP in the sequel they are doing it because they want to and not because people demanding things they're not entitled to.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.