I was strongly anticipating the game... now it's in limbo in my books.
If they release it close to the other versions, I'll get it. If they release it with significant additional content to make up for the delay, I'll get it. If they release it at a discounted price such that it is at least slightly cheaper than the current (at the time) cost of the other versions, I'll get it.
If the only difference between the versions is that they've added Upad controls, they release it with a significant delay, and they charge full price for it, then I'll be looking for a different third party game to buy instead - I'll just go one further down on my "list" of third-party titles that I'm interested in.
In my opinion, this is the best approach to the situation. No net harm to third-party situation, but no support for disrespectful attitudes.
Mind you, I'm still waiting for a member of the so-called "gaming media" to actually ask Ubisoft how they justify this after the excuse they gave for the Rayman Legends delay. It seems to me that any real journalist would have asked the equivalent question by now. Sadly, the "gaming media" is nothing more than a heap of sycophants and trolls, more interested in clickbait, or sucking up to the industry for favours and freebies.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
