Zero999 said:
t3mporary_126 said:
Zero999 said:
if sony or MS want to help in advertising, it's one thing. but it's a company's job to market it's own games, with first party companies having no obligation to advertise non exclusive third party titles. And we aren't talking about much, companies are skiping a damn logo and then complaining about sales of a version they didn't create awareness of.
|
But if Sony and MS always wants to help out in advertising then Nintendo will have to do the same as well. Unfortunately Nintendo is a smaller company than Sony and much smaller than MS.
And that logo does make a difference which shows how much Nintendo needs to enter the marketing war with MS and Sony for big multiplatform 3rd party games at least.
|
Nintendo doesn't have to pay for other companies to put a damn logo of a version of their game. companies have to make games to make money, not the other way around.
|
Joint advertising is a big part of alot of industries, you may not think its fair but it is very lucrative, they can share the cost of advertising while making each others product look good.
Nintendo can ignore this if they want, but they will be the only ones losing out.