kowenicki said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
sales2099 said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
sales2099 said:
Worse? More profit, gen over gen gains, and coasting on 2008 prices compared to PS3 price dropping $150 in the last 5 years, while also introducing their own gimped $200 model just to get to a "statistical tie". Ok buddy.
Getting off topic here. Point being MS can and does support their consoles when the environment allows them to be sustainable and thrive.
|
If it pleases you that MS made more money from its consumers than Sony then fair enough, but personally I care more about games and Sony kicked MS's ass at that, and thats why people were willing to spend more on Sony's console than Microsoft's.
You see it as a statistical tie, but it was the foundations for all the hype the PS4 got and a lot of the negativity xbox one got. The support you talk about has been non existant on xbox 360 compared to PS3.
and...
"ANYONE can and does support their consoles when the environment allows them to be sustainable and thrive."
fixed.
|
Fun fact: Metacritic has 360 with more 90+, 80-89, and 70-79 games then PS3.
Sorry buddy. XBLA was a beast, but hey back then you were probably too busy claiming that AAA games made indie games irrelevant to notice. But the results are there, 360 has a bigger and better library.
|
http://uk.ign.com/blogs/bravo.4/2013/03/20/ps3-vs-360-exclusives-metascores-fullretail-games-updated-3202013
try again.
|
so indies dont matter after all?
|
They never did to me. But when people like you take indies so seriously, I can understand why people use it as a +1 for PS4 over XB1. I dont agree with it though.
